User talk:Ineuw
Duplicate images
[edit]{{Helpme}} - Resolved.
In this category there are 18 images with their names starting with VOL3 that are exact duplicates of the images with the names starting with HHBHM, all uploaded by me. Can I have the images beginning with VOL3 deleted please? — — Ineuw talk 13:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Ineuw: This was done. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:11, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Much thanks. — Ineuw talk 19:54, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- You're welcome. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:59, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Much thanks. — Ineuw talk 19:54, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
File:To the Victor Belongs the Spoils.djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Xover (talk) 09:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:12, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
[edit]A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
File:A B Alexandrov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Changing categories
[edit]
Wrongly categorized the uploaded files and I need to change it. I am asking to recategorize the 205 files in Category:Africa, by Élisée Reclus (4 volumes) which is the root category, to Category:Africa by Élisée Reclus, Volume 1 as indicated by the "V1" in the filenames.
I don't know if there is a bot for categorization, and if there is one, whether I am authorized, or know how, to use it.— Ineuw talk 23:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Done with Cat-a-lot. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: . Thanks again for your kind help. — Ineuw talk 18:25, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- You're welcome. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:55, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: . Thanks again for your kind help. — Ineuw talk 18:25, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Renaming images to match the format of the image names to be uploaded
[edit]
The following images in Category:Every Woman's Encyclopaedia, Volume 1 (book) require standardized file names for the hundreds of images to follow. This standard notation applies to all my image uploads for Wikisource books.
Is there a fast way to move the 22 images and leave the old names as a redirect? Or, must I do this manually? — Ineuw talk 12:13, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- You could copy text "File renaming criterion #1: At the original uploader’s request." To help, and you could also use {{Rename}} in a preview, soon to be abandoned.
- Thanks. — Ineuw talk 23:20, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
File:T S Nandakumar and His Guru (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Draceane talkcontrib. 12:49, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Please, add a note to the file description.
[edit]You modified the original artwork, linked by you [1] Thanks, --Ooligan (talk) 07:16, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
File tagging File:Autokey 02.svg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Autokey 02.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Krd 08:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Autokey 06.svg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Autokey 06.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Krd 08:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Autokey 07.png
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Autokey 07.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Krd 08:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Autokey 04.svg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Autokey 04.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Krd 08:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Autokey 05.svg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Autokey 05.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Krd 08:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Autokey 03.svg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Autokey 03.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Krd 08:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Autokey 01.png
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Autokey 01.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Krd 08:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
File copyright status
[edit]Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their source is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:15, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Every Autokey icon was uploaded from Linux collection for Autokey. They are downloadable and free.— Ineuw talk 13:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Evidently, Krd has reviewed Ticket:2020031810000459 and found that it contains insufficient permission for the seven files above. Where can the public see that "They are downloadable and free"? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: The source of the images is the Linux icon collection. If they don't meet commons criteria, delete them. — Ineuw talk 17:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Where can the public see "the Linux icon collection"? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 17:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Icon Archive is one. But one can download icon packages from the distro packages. Mine are from icons of Linux Mint Cinnamon.— Ineuw talk 02:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Where is the licensing documented? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Icon Archive is one. But one can download icon packages from the distro packages. Mine are from icons of Linux Mint Cinnamon.— Ineuw talk 02:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Where can the public see "the Linux icon collection"? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 17:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: The source of the images is the Linux icon collection. If they don't meet commons criteria, delete them. — Ineuw talk 17:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Evidently, Krd has reviewed Ticket:2020031810000459 and found that it contains insufficient permission for the seven files above. Where can the public see that "They are downloadable and free"? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Hope this is the right place
[edit]For GitHub stuff use josephj111111@gmail.com Everything else josephj222222@gmail.com 162.219.176.74 09:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Popular Science Monthly/Contributors has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Jmabel ! talk 20:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel My thought is that a list of scientific and academic contributors to the publication merit a category, even though many are not displayed. My Wikisource contributions cover volumes 1 to 87 covering the years 1872 to 1915. I was not interested in the rest of the volumes. Finally, why bother? Why waste time on this? — Ineuw talk 20:59, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- A category would be fine, but the hat note basically says to use this category like a gallery. Please comment at the CfD, not here, though. - Jmabel ! talk 21:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- I have now created at Popular Science Monthly contributors more or less what you originally intended. I imagine that by now you understand the difference between a category and a gallery and that, in particular, if there is a category for a particular person, and there is a potential parent category that also applies to the person, the person's category, not an individual photo, belongs in that parent category.
- I've done by far the harder part of this cleanup in making a proper gallery page. I would greatly appreciate it if you would go through Category:Popular Science Monthly contributors and, where the photos are for people who have a category, put that category rather than the photo in Category:Popular Science Monthly contributors. - Jmabel ! talk 23:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Much thanks. I understand, and put it on my list.— Ineuw talk 23:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Marc Legault
[edit]Hi, Just to be sure: you took the photo File:Marc Legault, (comédien).jpg yourself? I'm asking because it can look like a selfie taken by Marc Legault. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- I wish he knew how to take a selfie.— Ineuw talk 19:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)