User talk:0x0a

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

What Permission Details are Required of Her?

[edit]

@0x0a, Thank you for reviewing my image upload, but what specific information or permission details are required of her in the email? Also, do I personally have to write to Commons too or her email will be enough? Stephenranks (talk) 15:52, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Stephenranks The permission should be send by the photographer normally, or by the subject of the photograph if the copyright was explicitly transferred by contract. Please direct her to this page to release the rights to this work. 0x0a (talk) 23:37, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check Lisence my countray

[edit]

{{PD-Iran}} . . / . . All my Files Have This Permission. Check Details. . . / . . M najafvand (talk) 13:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

مجوز Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

[edit]

{{cc-by-4.0}}
Are you problem by this licence?? Instagram Have This Permission. M najafvand (talk) 14:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@M najafvand: :The vast majority of images found on the internet, inluding Instagram and Facebook, are copyright-protected and may not be uploaded. The fact that an image has been posted to a publicly-available website does not give you implied permission to re-use it nor to upload it here.

_______

@0x0a: Dear:

When dealing with photographs of people, we are required to consider the legal and moral rights of the subject. These rights may restrict or impose obligations on those taking, uploading or re-using a photo. These issues are quite distinct from the copyright status of the photo. A Creative Commons licence or public domain status, for example, means that the copyright owner (usually the photographer) has waived or lost certain rights and that their permission to use the photo is not required. However, this does not affect any rights belonging to the subject of the photograph. more : https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people حقوق هر شخص و هر کشوری قابل احترام است.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by M najafvand (talk • contribs) 09:16, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Third-party images published by the National Weather Service

[edit]

I've now reviewed 1,000 images uploaded under the rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template and requested deletion of several.

The arguments for deletion, and to keep, are now following repetitive, predictable patterns and it would greatly help all involved if we could centralise discussion and obtain some wider community input.

Therefore, I have opened an RfC to gather opinions. Apologies in advance: it's long and detailed, but is frankly nothing compared to the words and time expended by all parties up to this point. Probably the most crucial issue revolves around how we interpret a general disclaimer published at weather.gov (Q.1 in the RfC).

Your advice is greatly appreciated! --Rlandmann (talk) 10:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Android Auto UI.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 02:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you delete my user page.

[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bonthefox3 2001:EE0:4D4C:7F10:1135:2490:77AB:1134 12:42, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We don't delete user page. We archive them. 0x0a (talk) 13:49, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We don't delete user talk pages, but we delete user-pages if the user makes a request, but I wonder why you're asking if here? ─ Aafī on Mobile (talk) 06:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help me?

[edit]

Hi, File:Camila Cabello - GODSPEED (Live from the 2024 MTV VMAs).jpg I uploaded this file but i still didn't understand why it's fake license, could you please explain? Also, then what license should be replaced in this file? I'm sorry for uploading non free files on common wikipedia, it was almost a year so I think I forgot warning... Camilasdandelions (talk) 08:32, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Camilasdandelions: The videos on YouTube are copyright-protected by default and should not be uploaded here unless the author explicitly states that they are released under a Creative Commons Attribution License, e.g. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsCxG0MTrJs). 0x0a (talk) 08:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Camilasdandelions: Please try to upload your own photos first to avoid copyright problems, and then upload external images after you know some basic copyright knowledge. --0x0a (talk) 08:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, then what situation is always accepted? I thought YouTube videos are always okay to be uploaded, but now I'll not upload it unless those permissions in description. Camilasdandelions (talk) 09:31, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Camilasdandelions: Please describe a specific situation, otherwise I cannot answer. Generally, the most of the MVs and album covers are not OK to upload because of copyright protection. These pages COM:CB and COM:L list what situations or licenses are acceptable. 0x0a (talk) 10:07, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well the main reason why I thought YT vid is OK to be uploaded is, File:Ariana Grande at the Met Gala 2024 (1).jpg#mw-jump-to-license. This file is also from YouTube, VOGUE, but I'm not sure if this is marked as "free-use" in description.
Accoring to this, upon file was uploaded by Vogue magazine, then can files from Vogue always be used in Wikimedia?
Also I can't figure out what's a difference between CC 3.0, 2,0, 4,0 etc. Camilasdandelions (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see only a few Vogue Taiwan videos released under Creative Commons Attribution License, and we do host some of them. If you're not sure if a material is OK to be uploaded, you can ask here to get a prompt response. In addition, all CC versions (1.0, 2.0 ... 4.0) are acceptable, and you don't need to care about the differences between them. 0x0a (talk) 12:05, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I definitely have some experience with vogue Taiwan licensing, We have all of their CC stuff. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 19:03, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]