Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
File:Careening of a pirogue on a sandy beach of a tiny island in the Mekong near Don Det in Laos.jpg
Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2025 at 02:26:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:26, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:26, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2025 at 18:41:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info American actress Sydney Sweeney at the Once Upon A Time In Hollywood premiere on July 22, 2019 in Hollywood, California. Created and uploaded by Toglenn– nominated by Redmyname31 -- ツredmyname 💬 18:41, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- ツredmyname 💬 18:41, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Composition is a bit tight (top and bottom), but good focus and depth of field. Nice portrait of a famous actress -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:34, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2025 at 15:01:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info I've hesitated about this one because of the blurry foreground but what a great composition, expression, and image quality. created by Byrdyak – uploaded by Byrdyak – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:19, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support ----IrksomeBuccaneer2635 (talk) 18:35, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:31, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:11, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 21:51, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support I agree with the nominator that the blurry foreground is distracting, and I also regret that the feet and the tail are hidden, however it's a good quality picture, and nice posture of a "not-so-easy-to-take" wild subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2025 at 14:18:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Portugal
- Info ...memento mori... All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:18, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:18, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Super high resolution and very interesting Cmao20 (talk) 15:10, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:20, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Blurry at full size but acceptable level of detail at lower resolution. The uneven light / shadow is not very successful, nevertheless the subject is in my view extraordinary -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:47, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2025 at 14:18:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Russia
- Info: Art Nouveau exterior of the Baltic Fleet's Machine School building. I feel that the bleak winter light complements and accentuates the state of decay of this once spectacular building. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:18, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:18, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Unsharp and the sky has strange colors. Also very obvious chromatic aberration -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2025 at 12:27:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Science#Astronomy
- Info created and uploaded by Avsa, nominated by Yann
- Info The Triangle of Everything is a log-log chart of everything that has existed since the Big Bang or could ever have existed. All existing objects are bound by three lines: the Compton Limit, the Schwarzschild radius, and the Hubble radius. The vertices are the Big Bang on the right, the Observable universe on the top left, and the heat death of the universe / true vacuum / zero-point energy universe on the bottom left.
- Support Well made graphics with a lot of useful information. This is more than #Astronomy, so may be it should be in #Science. -- Yann (talk) 12:27, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Info For the record, this nomination unanimously fails on Wikipedia (1-5): en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Triangle of Everything.png -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:10, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose For 2 reasons: 1) Visually, you can't read the texts written in small size, unless it's displayed huge like a poster. 2) Too much of "everything / anything", that is obviously too complex, specific and cluttered, with unnecessary curved arrows, ellipses, or asterisks in captions saying "Asterisk means still hypothetical", etc. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:10, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2025 at 21:00:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Airports
- Info created – uploaded & nominated by -- Don (talk) 21:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Don (talk) 21:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I'm sorry, I have no idea what's going on here. This photo was featured here on Commons on 9 December 2016 under another name. See nomination here: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palm Beach County Park Lantana Airport photo D Ramey Logan.jpg. It's in the gallery Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Airports. Then Ziv renamed the file yesterday (1 Feb 2025) at "original uploader’s request", and now you are nominating it again under the new name. How many stars do you need for this photo? --Cart (talk) 21:36, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- It got even more confusing because Ziv didn't know how the "|com-nom=" parameter should be used in the 'Assessment' template, so that link on the file's page went to this new nom. I have now added the 'com-nom' so it goes to the original nomination, since it was made under the old name. --Cart (talk) 21:44, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Sorry my mistake --Don (talk) 22:32, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, just another thing. I see that you overwrote the original file (the one that was evaluated during the first during the original nomination) with another version on 12 April 2022. That goes against the rules of COM:OVERWRITE#Exceptions. There shouldn't be any major alterations to a photo after a photo has been assessed by the community. Your new version has a considerably different light and saturation. So, could you please revert that and create a separate file with the new editing. After that you can nominate a "Delist and replace" nomination for the new version. That happens from time to time when photographers are not please with their first edit. --Cart (talk) 22:43, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- I am confused. (and under the weather due to a surgical infection I am fighting) perhaps you can help me do this? I only have 1 hand/arm at the current time. Hunt and peck makes your request difficult. ty Carter. Don (talk) 00:05, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- I can revert and make a separate file for you, but you have to make the "Delist and replace" nomination for your new version of this photo yourself. But once I've cleaned this up, there is no hurry. You can do that nomination when your are feeling better. Until then, I hope you get well soon. --Cart (talk) 00:24, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, all done. I've separated the two versions, but there are links between them under "Other versions" on the file pages, so you don't have to go looking for them later when you feel better. --Cart (talk) 00:41, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- I can revert and make a separate file for you, but you have to make the "Delist and replace" nomination for your new version of this photo yourself. But once I've cleaned this up, there is no hurry. You can do that nomination when your are feeling better. Until then, I hope you get well soon. --Cart (talk) 00:24, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- I am confused. (and under the weather due to a surgical infection I am fighting) perhaps you can help me do this? I only have 1 hand/arm at the current time. Hunt and peck makes your request difficult. ty Carter. Don (talk) 00:05, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2025 at 10:23:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Brassicaceae
- Info Rocket blossom with hoarfrost. Focus stack of 9 frames. All by Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 10:23, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 10:23, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support For me a special shot. I don't know if the thin more or less horizontal stripes on the right belong to it.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Info The stripes are cobweb. Thanks for your vote.--Ermell (talk) 20:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the answer. That's what I suspected.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:05, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 23:12, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:29, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:19, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:22, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating Cmao20 (talk) 15:08, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Exellent shot. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:41, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2025 at 05:23:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
- Info Sur En/Sent, municipality of Scuol, kanton Graubünden. Sculpture Futurchild - 2021. Artwork by Andreas Hofer künstler, Davos, Switzerland is trying to connect art and nature in public outdoor spaces. This sculpture stands with many others along a mountain path near Sur En in the canton of Graubünden.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:23, 2 February 2025 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:23, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:30, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose To me the light feels ordinary, and makes the scene appear flat. And, the background is busy and just as in focus as the subject, which is distracting. Though I couldn't produce a better result in the same setting. Henrysz (talk) 04:00, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support: oddly appealing. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:22, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support The white balance feels a bit warm to me but nevertheless interesting and good quality Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment and support. The photo was taken in October with autumn colors. But I can make the colors a little less warm.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:35, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2025 at 02:30:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Jewelery
- Info Golden Madonna of Essen part of the Essen Cathedral Treasury, Dated around the year 980, it is both the oldest known sculpture of the Madonna and the oldest free-standing medieval sculpture north of the Alps; technique: Focus stack, Hand-Held
- Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 02:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 02:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:51, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 11:59, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:06, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:21, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2025 at 02:26:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Apidae (Bumble Bees, Honey Bees, Carpenter Bees, Cuckoo Bees, Orchid Bees, and Stingless Bees)
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:26, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:26, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:49, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:16, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2025 at 02:17:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Books
- Info Large Carolingian Gospel Book from around 800 in the Essen Cathedral Treasury, opening page to the Gospel of Mark, technique: Focus stacked, hand-held
- Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 02:17, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 02:17, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating! Cmao20 (talk) 02:49, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 12:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:21, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2025 at 20:52:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
- Info Female coyote in the group of about three residential coyotes at Metzger Farm Open Space in Westminster and Broomfield, Colorado. Created by Jim Kennedy – uploaded from Flickr by Jarble – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 20:52, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support My plan was to nominate another picture, but Mother Coyote is just toooo good looking... (IMHO) -- Zquid (talk) 20:52, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:00, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I have to change my mind. Basile is right. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 09:57, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 22:28, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice composition but the quality is not there, sorry. Low level of detail, noisy picture with artifacts -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Basile, a little surprised this has got support. The composition is excellent for sure but this is some way short of QI levels of quality. I know it's not, but it looks like an upscaled phone camera photo. Cmao20 (talk) 02:48, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 11:59, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Zquid (talk) 18:56, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2025 at 19:48:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 19:48, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 19:48, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:47, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 11:06, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose can't say I'm fond of the lighting. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:30, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2025 at 17:37:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
- Info created by Hackercatxxy – uploaded by Hackercatxxy – nominated by Ankermast -- --Ankermast (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- --Ankermast (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hi and welcome to the FPC. Not sure how or why you didn't include the gallery section, but it is actually necessary for an FPC nomination (see the rules). I have added it for you and it should all work now. Anyway, good luck now! --Cart (talk) 18:35, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- I removed it from the source text because it looked like a template that should only be inserted after the file becoming a quality image and that would not produce a proper wikilink. --Ankermast (talk) 08:34, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hi and welcome to the FPC. Not sure how or why you didn't include the gallery section, but it is actually necessary for an FPC nomination (see the rules). I have added it for you and it should all work now. Anyway, good luck now! --Cart (talk) 18:35, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but while this photo has an excellent composition and nice colours, the image quality (noise + blur) is some way short of FP. Cmao20 (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Cmao20. Not even a QI unfortunately -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose too noisy. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:31, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see the issue with the quality, it looks sharp to me. Here is a denoised version, what do you think: File:Elbphilharmonie, Hamburg, denoise.jpg Henrysz (talk) 04:21, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- There are still important quality issues in this version, with the water in particular. Moreover, in this new version, the metadata have disappeared. -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:20, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others, however I think with a better raw data process the picture might have a chance --A.Savin 22:58, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2025 at 17:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Luxembourg
- Info View of the Grund at dawn, the quarter located in the valley below the centre of Luxembourg City on the banks of the Alzette river with the Neimënster Abbey in the foreground. After the original Benedictine abbey on the Altmünster Plateau was destroyed in 1542, the monks began building a new abbey or "Neumünster" in 1606. In 1618, a marble tomb was constructed to house the bones of John the Blind. The Abbey was destroyed in 1684 during the Siege of Luxembourg. The Abbey began to rebuild on the same site in 1688 and extended in 1720. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:35, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:35, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support This is obviously excellent and I would have nominated it at some point. However, I've added a note where I can see a little bit of aliasing. Cmao20 (talk) 19:49, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Cmao20: For some strange reason I cannot see your note, can you give me a hint or try it on the original picture? --Poco a poco (talk) 10:55, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Poco a poco, added on original picture. Tbh I'm being a little bit picky, on reflection. Cmao20 (talk) 12:53, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Done It's fine, it has been an improvement, I didn't see it Poco a poco (talk) 14:36, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Delightful view and lighting. --Paracel63 (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:04, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 11:06, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:29, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:39, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2025 at 08:10:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
- Info created by UK Ministry of Defence – uploaded by TheArmchairSoldier – nominated by Vitaium -- Vitaium (talk) 08:10, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Vitaium (talk) 08:10, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Wing cut. Yann (talk) 09:34, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Lead room missing at the right, and cropped out wing. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2025 at 20:41:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland
- Info The Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Katowice, Poland. Shame about the construction on the left, but I like the light and detail. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 20:41, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:41, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 12:04, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Kind of a cluttered street but I am sure this is the best feasible view of the facade of this church and I also like the light Cmao20 (talk) 13:19, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. --Rbrechko (talk) 19:51, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:29, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2025 at 12:17:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae
- Info Already FP on English Wikipedia but not here. IMO a good and impressive focus stack, aesthetic arrangement, nice warm natural light. created by W.carter – uploaded by W.carter – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:17, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:17, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 12:34, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Yes, a very nice composition and well executed photograph. --Harlock81 (talk) 15:55, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Per Harlock81.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:16, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:30, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 12:03, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:13, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:33, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 20:26, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 20:39, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful assortment of autumn colors, very good quality. Wooden background fits the subject well -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:10, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. Since it's an oak plank, the idea is a sort of "before and after tree". The acorns will become oak trees and the plank was an oak. (Yes, I returned the acorns to the forest after the photo was made.)--Cart (talk) 02:42, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- It is a lovely idea and thank you for speaking more about the artistic idea behind this photo. Cmao20 (talk) 12:54, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Like an eternal cycle. I think the light is also very good -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:39, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:31, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2025 at 22:02:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1950-1959
- Info created by Gene Herrick, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
- Support I like the joy of the people. -- Yann (talk) 22:02, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:02, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 02:04, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:46, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 11:34, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:55, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support For me a beautiful photo. I had a great admiration for Martin Luther King at that time.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:12, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:29, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:11, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 20:26, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Photograph taken at the right moment -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:45, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2025 at 21:05:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Czech Republic
- Info created by Theklan – uploaded by Theklan – nominated by Theklan -- Theklan (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Theklan (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support but maybe the middle section is a bit on the dark side.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:09, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2025 at 11:00:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Poland
- Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 11:00, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Pudelek (talk) 11:00, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunate composition with the predominant shadow, and the boat is a bit overexposed. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good enought for me Юрий Д.К 12:02, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry, have been going back and forth on this one but the composition doesn't work for me. Instead of adding to the photo, it feels like the reeds just obscure a more interesting composition. Also quite small for FP in 2025. Cmao20 (talk) 13:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2025 at 01:42:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Momotidae_(Motmots)
- Info Broad-billed motmot (Electron platyrhynchum). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 01:42, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 01:42, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:24, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:54, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:25, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Schnobby (talk) 08:33, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 11:26, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Guard bird on duty. --Thi (talk) 15:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:45, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:35, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:28, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:38, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:31, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:44, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
File:Studio-workshop in Abramtsevo.jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2025 at 11:24:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info Studio-workshop in en:Abramtsevo, Sergiyevo-Posadsky District, Moscow Oblast created by Елена Нечипоренко - uploaded and nominated by FBilula (talk) 11:24, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 11:24, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Very nice, scenic composition Cmao20 (talk) 20:39, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful light and colours, impressive wood architecture. – Aristeas (talk) 20:51, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Rocky Masum (talk) 02:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:25, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:54, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 11:26, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 08:10, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:43, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:04, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:35, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:27, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 12:00, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:32, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:43, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2025 at 09:00:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Laos
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support Stunning Cmao20 (talk) 20:38, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Again a great sky and beautiful reflection; cock and chickens bring life into it. – Aristeas (talk) 20:53, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:17, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:20, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral a bit busy, and looks somewhat a bit oversaturated. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:25, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:01, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:26, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 12:00, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:38, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support I don't love the oversaturation, but the image is very stunning. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:33, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Mirapecten mirificus, featured
Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2025 at 08:42:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Right valve
-
Left valve
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Pectinidae
- Info The right an the left valve of a specimen of a Miraculous Scallop, Mirapecten mirificus; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 08:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 12:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Super high resolution! Cmao20 (talk) 20:35, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 20:54, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:18, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:45, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 18:20, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 21:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:04, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:40, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2025 at 20:42:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
- Info all by imehling –-- imehling (talk) 20:42, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- imehling (talk) 20:42, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I prefer the light of the existing FP but this is from a different, wider angle so I think it can also be FP Cmao20 (talk) 20:33, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support In this photo the water is high enough to show Pfalzgrafenstein Castle (right) like a ship in the water, as appropriate for its special shape. The juxtaposition of the two castles works very well. – Aristeas (talk) 20:57, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:17, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:26, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:25, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, nothing special for me. --A.Savin 20:35, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I have to side with A.Savin. The picture is good, but no wow. Gyrostat (talk) 16:51, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2025 at 17:56:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural (section for Taiwan will be created)
- Info Nice cloudy scene in Orchid Island, Taiwan. This photo reminds the Bliss a little for me. Сreated by Pai Shih – uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К 17:56, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 17:56, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Dear Юрий Д.К, thank you for the nomination. Just a short hint: for the gallery link please use just the existing gallery page Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural. It has not yet a section for Taiwan, but if this nomination is successful I will add it. You do not need to create a new gallery page for natural scenes from Taiwan – we need that only when we get a large count of natural scene photos from Taiwan. Until that we just use the general Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural gallery page. Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you Юрий Д.К 19:15, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I like it very much. -- -donald- (talk) 05:59, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 06:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support The sight of the open expanse with the fresh grass and the impressive clouds is calming and relaxing. There are some small signs of retouching/masking at the border between land and sky. Assuming good intentions I guess that the photographer has combined two shots – a long exposure to get these silk-smooth clouds and a short one to get sharp grass – taken at the same place. That makes sense. – Aristeas (talk) 08:33, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, something special is missing here, in my view. Building, animal, or anything. Moreover, the transition between grass and sky is weird in the background. Maybe a photomontage, but it's not indicated -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:11, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Hi. Transition between grass and sky appear weird because it is a trace from chromatic aberration correction. Please see original on Flickr. There are a lot of pink CAs on the original and I've decided to fix it. Sadly it is almost impossible to remove all CAs without consequences. Юрий Д.К 18:10, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- This transition is more the effect of a combination of photos, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- upon revisiting this, I saw that there is a arc shaped lens flare to the far right of the picture, which overlays both the sky and the mountain, implying that this isn't composed of two photos. (unless the lens flare is added in.) However, the grass seems to lose its serrated edge when seen against the sky, compared to when seen against the mountain, implying that it is edited. But that's an elementary mistake to make for someone who edits in such a subtle lens flare. I don't know what to think. Henrysz (talk) 04:54, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Something is sure, you can't get this or that without heavy post-processing -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:36, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- No lens flares here, it is a rainbow. Please look closer Юрий Д.К 19:41, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry but per Basile I'm missing something extra to elevate this pretty but rather empty landscape to the status of truly extraordinary. Cmao20 (talk) 20:28, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:54, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, the composition with those slightly blurred clouds is not convincing me to be outstanding enough for FP. --Milseburg (talk) 17:59, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support How ethereal.. Henrysz (talk) 04:11, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support Maybe something is missing in this photo, but I don't really mind. The perfect undulations in the landscape and the color combination are enough for me. It's the art of leaving out.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:56, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:10, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above Poco a poco (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2025 at 17:35:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Gastropoda
- Info Sea slug (Phyllidia ocellata), Zanzibar, Tanzania. It lives in the Indo-West Pacific Ocean and like many nudibranchs, Phyllidia ocellata feeds on sponges. This animal can measure up to 35 millimetres (1.4 in) in length. Note: we have no FP of this species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:35, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:35, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The animal is beautifully colorful but not sharp enough for my taste. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 23:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- I understand that sharpness can be something subjective. I just added some additional information about this species, it's a small aninmal (3,5 cm long) and they are always on the move. This shot is the best among over 100 and I have only seen this species in one spot. This would be of course also the first FP of this species. Regarding the DoF I used f/7,1, I rarely can use a deeper DoF underwater to avoid too much noise and blur. Poco a poco (talk) 07:15, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- I did not intend to question your skills and efforts, Poco. I judged the image without knowing the background of its creation, which, in my opinion, should be the primary focus when evaluating photos. Your underwater series, like your other images, is a reference work, and I can hardly imagine anyone ever surpassing it. What bothers me about the image is merely the low sharpness. My decision was about 51 to 49 against it. Best regards. --Ermell (talk) 11:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support It's plenty sharp enough in parts, just has a shallow depth of field. IMO fine for an underwater shot. Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 06:24, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 08:21, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:03, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:56, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:28, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 21:07, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:51, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 11:17, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2025 at 05:25:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Primulaceae
- Info Soaked in rain Cyclamen coum sown between the roots of an Alder (Alnus) Focus stack of 10 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:25, 28 January 2025 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:25, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good composition. And I love how very green it is, in the midst of decay Cmao20 (talk) 12:55, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 18:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Like Cmao20, I love the contrast between the warm earth tones of the dead leaves and the lush green of the Cyclamen, between decay and fresh life. And the shining leaves give a very intense feeling of the wetness. – Aristeas (talk) 19:25, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 23:14, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 06:24, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:56, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2025 at 18:16:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Thailand
- Info I like the golden light and the symmetrical composition. No FPs from this place. created by BigDom – uploaded by BigDom – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:16, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:16, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:32, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice soft light, and I like how the four big colourful decorations (?) emphasize the symmetry. – Aristeas (talk) 10:24, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 23:16, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 06:24, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:55, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:30, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2025 at 17:55:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
- Info created by Theklan – uploaded by User:Theklan – nominated by Theklan -- Theklan (talk) 17:55, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Theklan (talk) 17:55, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
OpposeSorry. I really like the near-fisheye perspective and I think it's pretty interesting but there is quite a lot of noise and also purple chromatic aberration that for me stops it from being one of the best on Commons. Cmao20 (talk) 18:23, 27 January 2025 (UTC)- You are right. I have reduced noise and the chromatic aberration (mostly purple). Let mw know if you see it better. Theklan (talk) 18:47, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- It's definitely an improvement. I've struck my oppose, will have a think about if I think it's good enough to support. Thank you for the improvements. Cmao20 (talk) 18:50, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Aristeas's arguments have convinced me Cmao20 (talk) 23:01, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support IMHO this candidate deserves a little bit more love and discussion. Normally curved projections are not my cup of tea, but here the (near-?)fisheye perspective works very well with the composition and creates an intense feeling of immersion. The patch of sunlight nicely emphasizes the Alwyn Court building, and the sky is good. The photo is a little bit soft (mostly as a side-effect of noise removal) and I feel that the processing could be improved. But it’s certainly a photo that surprises me nicely, makes me think and teaches me something new, therefore IMHO it deserves the star. – Aristeas (talk) 20:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Aristeas. The image was taken with a 8-mm objective, not a fish-eye, but very near. Theklan (talk) 21:19, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:55, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support nice perspective. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:03, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:31, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
File:Lysander Spooner by Hardy.jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2025 at 07:13:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1880-1889
- Info created by Amory Nelson Hardy – restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:13, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:13, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good, characteristic portrait of an interesting person, excellent restoration. – Aristeas (talk) 19:37, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:28, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:09, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:56, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:48, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:02, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 06:28, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Thu 30 Jan → Tue 04 Feb Fri 31 Jan → Wed 05 Feb Sat 01 Feb → Thu 06 Feb Sun 02 Feb → Fri 07 Feb Mon 03 Feb → Sat 08 Feb Tue 04 Feb → Sun 09 Feb
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Sun 26 Jan → Tue 04 Feb Mon 27 Jan → Wed 05 Feb Tue 28 Jan → Thu 06 Feb Wed 29 Jan → Fri 07 Feb Thu 30 Jan → Sat 08 Feb Fri 31 Jan → Sun 09 Feb Sat 01 Feb → Mon 10 Feb Sun 02 Feb → Tue 11 Feb Mon 03 Feb → Wed 12 Feb Tue 04 Feb → Thu 13 Feb
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/February 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/February 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/February 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.